[General] Zimbra email server suddenly stopped working!!
Eng. Sabah Al-Sabah
sabah at techsys.net
Thu Nov 18 23:09:31 +03 2010
Thanks Burhan for this information.
Best Regards,
============================
Eng. Sabah Al-Sabah
General Manager
Technical Systems Est.
sabah at techsys.net
www.techsys.net
============================
On 11/18/2010 10:16 PM, Burhan Khalid wrote:
> The advantage of quickly sending emails only truly comes into force if
> you have a large volume of user-to-user emails.
>
> You can get the same speed in retrieving large emails by setting up an
> IMAP aggregator on your network - your in-house email server is
> basically doing the same thing when its delivering non-local emails.
>
> The same can be said about sending emails. The end user sees this
> "speed" in sending the emails because you are only connecting to the
> local SMTP instance on your local machine. Again, if you are sending
> any emails out - the aggregate bandwidth (and by extension "speed") is
> the same. The only difference is that instead of your clients
> connecting directly to outbound MTAs, its your server that is connecting.
>
> There are advantages though of having in-house email server. One of
> the main advantages is that you can do QoS on emails by setting up
> priority queues. So emails from say ceo at company.com
> <mailto:ceo at company.com> to board at company.com
> <mailto:board at company.com> have a higher priority; or emails from
> fianance@ with subject "Salary" have higher delivery priority.
>
> In reality though, this only makes sense if you have a large user base
> and very large volume of emails. The truth is that if you monitor your
> queues (be it either local or SMTP) you'll see that 99% of the time
> the queue is empty (idle).
>
> Other minor advantages of in-house email servers (but this is quickly
> being addressed by SaaS providers) is archiving/retrieval and other
> compliance actions. The "quick and dirty" way employed by many is you
> have a blackhole email which is relayed all emails. Enterprise email
> compliance devices (and hosted email providers) will give you more
> fine grain control, including things such as retention policy
> enforcement, encryption, etc.
>
> Again, only makes sense if you have such requirements either from your
> own internal audits or by some external pressure (as is the case with
> banks and financials).
>
> In your scenario, I would carefully analyze the true cost of hosting
> your own email service vs. deploying it on the cloud. Once you have
> done some basic profiling of your email use; I'm sure you'll realize
> that its actually cheaper to host it outside - especially considering
> the small number of mailboxes.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Burhan Khalid
> On 18 Nov 2010, at 18:25, Eng. Sabah Al-Sabah wrote:
>
>> Majed,
>> I do not need many email boxes, however having the server locally has
>> its advantages, like quick retrieval of large incoming emails and
>> quick sending as well.
>> I also have mailman running locally.
>>
>> Thanks for the tip any way.
>>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> ============================
>>
>> Eng. Sabah Al-Sabah
>>
>> General Manager
>>
>> Technical Systems Est.
>>
>> sabah at techsys.net
>>
>> www.techsys.net
>>
>> ============================
>> <graphics1.gif>
>>
>> On 11/18/2010 06:15 PM, Majed B. wrote:
>>> Eng. Sabah, how many mailboxes do you have? Do you require having
>>> emails on a local server?
>>> Google Apps Standard is free and offers 50 mailboxes. It comes with
>>> GMail, Sites& Docs.http://google.com/a/
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Eng. Sabah Al-Sabah<sabah at techsys.net> wrote:
>>>> Although I have been using it for a couple of years, I am not happy with it!
>>>> It is an over kill, at least for my small organization. It takes too much resources.
>>>> It is too complex to manage or update.
>>>> It is not compatible with the stock email client on the android (Nexus One).
>>>>
>>>> Today as I was struggling to fix this problem, I really considered trashing it and reverting back the old sendmail.
>>>> But now that it is working again, I think I shall keep it!
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> ============================
>>>>
>>>> Eng. Sabah Al-Sabah
>>>>
>>>> General Manager
>>>>
>>>> Technical Systems Est.
>>>>
>>>> sabah at techsys.net
>>>>
>>>> www.techsys.net
>>>>
>>>> ============================
>>>>
>>>> On 11/18/2010 05:57 PM, Bashar Al-Abdulhadi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes 3650 for a decade. :D
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Speaking of Zimbra dunno why redhat sold them to VMware, it was picking up in the region pretty well!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: "Eng. Sabah Al-Sabah"<sabah at techsys.net>
>>>> Sender:general-bounces at oskw.org
>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:52:16
>>>> To: General OpenSource Discussion<general at oskw.org>
>>>> Reply-To: General OpenSource Discussion<general at oskw.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [General] Zimbra email server suddenly stopped working!!
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> General mailing list
>>>> General at oskw.org
>>>> http://mail.oskw.org/mailman/listinfo/general_oskw.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> General mailing list
>>>> General at oskw.org
>>>> http://mail.oskw.org/mailman/listinfo/general_oskw.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> General mailing list
>>>> General at oskw.org
>>>> http://mail.oskw.org/mailman/listinfo/general_oskw.org
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Majed B.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> General mailing list
>>> General at oskw.org
>>> http://mail.oskw.org/mailman/listinfo/general_oskw.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> General mailing list
>> General at oskw.org <mailto:General at oskw.org>
>> http://mail.oskw.org/mailman/listinfo/general_oskw.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General at oskw.org
> http://mail.oskw.org/mailman/listinfo/general_oskw.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oskw.org/pipermail/general_oskw.org/attachments/20101118/a1bd5c72/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graphics1
Type: image/gif
Size: 30379 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://oskw.org/pipermail/general_oskw.org/attachments/20101118/a1bd5c72/attachment.gif>
More information about the General
mailing list